{"id":1606,"date":"2025-09-28T21:17:15","date_gmt":"2025-09-28T18:17:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.toplum.org.tr\/en\/?p=1606"},"modified":"2025-10-03T21:19:14","modified_gmt":"2025-10-03T18:19:14","slug":"turkiye-iraq-relations-on-the-geoeconomic-axis-an-analysis-on-strategic-partnership-and-dynamics-of-competition","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.toplum.org.tr\/en\/turkiye-iraq-relations-on-the-geoeconomic-axis-an-analysis-on-strategic-partnership-and-dynamics-of-competition\/","title":{"rendered":"T\u00fcrkiye-Iraq Relations on the Geoeconomic Axis: An Analysis on Strategic Partnership and Dynamics of Competition"},"content":{"rendered":"

The Rise of Geoeconomics as a Foreign Policy Instrument<\/strong><\/p>\n

Geoeconomics, in the literature of international relations, is a strategic concept that denotes the realization of geopolitical goals through economic means. This concept rests on the use of economic power as a mechanism of pressure or incentive toward foreign policy objectives. The transformations in the international system after the Cold War have compelled states to turn to economic methods in foreign policy rather than military interventions. Within this framework, economic sanctions, trade policies, and investment strategies provide ways of achieving geopolitical objectives while avoiding the high costs and risks associated with military action. However, the success of geoeconomic strategies depends on the suitability of the instruments employed and the degree of international cooperation; for such strategies lead to complex and multidimensional interactions that can sometimes produce unexpected outcomes.<\/p>\n

In the international system where the boundaries of globalization are increasingly blurred and gradually giving way to de-globalization, relations among states have become too complex to be explained solely by political and military factors. Economic factors\u2014particularly geoeconomic elements\u2014play a critical role in shaping states\u2019 foreign policy choices, thereby making the multidimensional nature of international relations even more pronounced. Fundamental elements such as geographical proximity, energy resources, trade routes, and market potential stand out as key determinants not only of competition but also of cooperation among states. In this context, the relations between T\u00fcrkiye and Iraq, two actors of strategic importance in the Middle East, constitute a distinctive case that demonstrates both the significance and the complexity of geoeconomic strategies. This analysis seeks to examine the multiple layers of T\u00fcrkiye-Iraq relations from a geoeconomic perspective, evaluating both countries\u2019 strategic interests as well as the implications of these relations for regional stability.<\/p>\n

Geoeconomic Dynamics and Strategic Alignment<\/strong><\/p>\n

Relations between T\u00fcrkiye and Iraq are not confined solely to traditional political and military interactions but instead possess a multilayered structure in which geopolitical objectives are pursued through economic instruments. This reality demonstrates that both countries actively employ economic diplomacy to safeguard their national interests while simultaneously consolidating their strategic positions in the region. At the core of these relations lie access to energy resources, the security of trade corridors, and regional stability\u2014factors of vital importance for both states.<\/p>\n

In economic terms, T\u00fcrkiye\u2019s identity as a regional economic power and industrial exporter, combined with its dependency on Iraq to meet a significant portion of its energy demand, creates a unique situation. Data from the Turkish Statistical Institute (T\u00dc\u0130K) and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs serve as concrete evidence of this mutual dependence. T\u00fcrkiye\u2019s exports to Iraq, amounting to 12.7 billion USD, and its imports, totaling 7.1 billion USD, reveal the asymmetric nature of trade; yet, the fact that T\u00fcrkiye constitutes Iraq\u2019s largest import market with a 26.7% share highlights the depth of Iraq\u2019s economic integration with T\u00fcrkiye. Likewise, the reality that approximately 40% of Iraq\u2019s oil exports and 20% of T\u00fcrkiye\u2019s energy needs flow through T\u00fcrkiye demonstrates how the prosperity and stability of both countries are directly interconnected.<\/p>\n

This mutual dependence naturally brings forth both areas of cooperation and spheres of competition. The Turkish contracting sector\u2019s undertaking of 1,101 projects worth 35 billion USD in Iraq over the past two decades illustrates T\u00fcrkiye\u2019s pivotal role in Iraq\u2019s reconstruction as well as the economic leverage this role confers. The bilateral trade volume reaching 24.1 billion USD is not merely a reflection of numerical growth but also an indicator of diversification in commercial ties. Exports of textiles, food, machinery, and iron-steel showcase T\u00fcrkiye\u2019s industrial capacity, while imports of crude oil reflect Iraq\u2019s abundance of energy resources.<\/p>\n

Infrastructure Projects and Reflections of Energy Dependency<\/strong><\/p>\n

One of the most significant geoeconomic projects that will shape the future of relations is the Development Road Project. The 1,200 km rail and highway line stretching from Basra to the Turkish border will not only enhance commercial flows between the two countries but will also create a new dynamic in global supply chains as an alternative trade corridor to the Suez Canal. The project\u2019s potential to improve logistical efficiency and reduce costs may also influence regional power balances by offering a strategic alternative to China\u2019s Belt and Road Initiative. The quadrilateral agreement signed between Iraq, T\u00fcrkiye, the United Arab Emirates, and Qatar demonstrates the political commitment behind this project.<\/p>\n

In the field of energy, the Kirkuk-Ceyhan Pipeline continues to be one of the cornerstones of bilateral relations. While this pipeline secures T\u00fcrkiye\u2019s energy supply, it also constitutes a vital source of revenue for Iraq. T\u00fcrkiye, by employing oil flows as a geoeconomic instrument, is able to increase its leverage over Iraq when necessary. The fact that the flow of crude oil from Northern Iraq through Ceyhan is subject to arbitration and technical agreements highlights the political and legal dimensions of energy cooperation. Future plans for new pipelines or natural gas partnerships are likely to make these dynamics even more complex.<\/p>\n

An Expanding Institutional Framework and the Security Focus<\/strong><\/p>\n

The multidimensional nature of relations is not confined to the spheres of economy and energy; it also encompasses areas such as security, water management, and institutional cooperation. Water management stands out as one of the most sensitive issues in bilateral ties, owing to the hydrological advantage T\u00fcrkiye has gained through its investments in the Southeastern Anatolia Project (GAP). While T\u00fcrkiye emphasizes cooperation under the principle of \u201cequitable and reasonable utilization,\u201d Iraq\u2019s criticisms of T\u00fcrkiye\u2019s dam policies during periods of drought highlight the constant need for dialogue and joint planning in this field. The ten-year framework agreement signed in 2024 seeks to introduce a strategic approach to this issue.<\/p>\n

On the other hand, the presence of the separatist terrorist organization PKK in Northern Iraq\u2014an issue of shared security concern for both countries\u2014is of vital importance for the healthy progress of economic and political relations. The security and cooperation memoranda signed in April and July 2024 aim to strengthen border security, intelligence sharing, and joint operational capacity against the PKK. These developments demonstrate that security cooperation has become a prerequisite for achieving geoeconomic objectives.<\/p>\n

Institutional cooperation also reinforces economic integration. The Joint Economic and Trade Committee (JETCO) protocol has set out commercial goals by addressing customs, logistics, and investment facilitation. Moreover, the memorandum signed between the T\u00fcrkiye Wealth Fund and the Iraq Development Fund establishes a concrete mechanism for evaluating joint investment opportunities in areas such as energy, infrastructure, and technology.<\/p>\n

This multidimensional network of relations illustrates that the T\u00fcrkiye-Iraq bond is built not only on economic interests but also on mutual trust and strategic alignment. Both countries strengthen their regional influence by employing geoeconomic instruments, yet in this process they must carefully maintain the delicate balance between cooperation and competition. In the future, factors such as fluctuations in global energy markets and climate change will further shape the dynamics of these relations. In this context, constructive dialogue and responsible policies will remain of critical importance for ensuring sustainable prosperity and security for both states.<\/p>\n

Geoeconomic Projection and Conclusion<\/strong><\/p>\n

T\u00fcrkiye-Iraq relations go beyond a mere state of mutual dependence; they represent a platform where both countries meticulously implement their geoeconomic strategies to maximize national interests. These strategies clearly demonstrate how economic instruments can be effectively utilized to achieve political objectives. On one hand, T\u00fcrkiye contributes to Iraq\u2019s development process through incentivizing policies such as infrastructure investments, energy agreements, and trade corridors, thereby enhancing its regional influence. On the other hand, it retains the potential to resort to deterrent instruments\u2014such as restricting energy flows\u2014when necessary. This dual approach constitutes a concrete example that reveals both the positive and punitive dimensions of geoeconomics.<\/p>\n

Iraq, however, does not participate in this dynamic interaction as a passive actor. On the contrary, it continues its efforts to diversify exports and establish alternative partnerships with the aim of increasing its economic independence and creating a strategic balance vis-\u00e0-vis T\u00fcrkiye. T\u00fcrkiye\u2019s initiatives toward renewable energy and Iraq\u2019s endeavors to integrate into global markets stand out as the key elements that will shape the trajectory of bilateral relations in the future. This reciprocal interaction carries vital strategic significance for both regional stability and economic growth.<\/p>\n

Looking ahead, T\u00fcrkiye-Iraq geoeconomic relations will be influenced by multiple uncertainties such as fluctuations in global energy markets, the regional effects of water scarcity induced by climate change, and ongoing political instability. Under these circumstances, both sides must manage their interdependence with delicate balance and develop coordinated policies in line with their shared interests. The continuation of incentivizing mechanisms such as joint projects and free trade zones will maximize the mutual gains of both countries. Conversely, resorting to deterrent policies that may erode trust and increase economic and political costs in the long term would jeopardize the sustainability of relations. Therefore, the priority of both countries should be to institutionalize constructive cooperation mechanisms and employ geoeconomic instruments as tools for positive transformation.<\/p>\n

Conclusion<\/strong><\/p>\n

In sum, this multidimensional network of relations\u2014ranging from infrastructure to energy, from trade to security\u2014demonstrates that T\u00fcrkiye-Iraq ties are shaped around a geoeconomic axis and present a strategic test that goes beyond mere economic interests. In the face of shared challenges such as climate change and political instability, every step taken carries the potential either to build bridges of cooperation between the two countries or to deepen the chasm of competition. In this complex and dynamic environment, the development of responsible and prudent policies by both T\u00fcrkiye and Iraq constitutes a fundamental condition for the sustainability of regional prosperity and security. Ultimately, the geoeconomic alignment of these two key regional actors may serve as a model for the entire Middle East and open the door to lasting stability.<\/p>\n

References<\/strong><\/p>\n

    \n
  1. Kriter Dergisi. (t.y.). T\u00fcrkiye-Irak ili\u015fkilerinde yeni d\u00f6nem: \u0130kili ili\u015fkilerden b\u00f6lgesel i\u015f birli\u011fine. Eri\u015fim adresi:\u00a0https:\/\/kriterdergi.com\/dis-politika\/turkiye-irak-iliskilerinde-yeni-donem-ikili-iliskilerden-bolgesel-is-birligine<\/a><\/li>\n
  2. T\u00fcrkiye Cumhuriyeti D\u0131\u015fi\u015fleri Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131. (t.y.).\u00a0T\u00fcrkiye Cumhuriyeti ve Irak Cumhuriyeti heyetleri aras\u0131nda yap\u0131lan g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmeye ili\u015fkin ortak sonu\u00e7 bildirisi. Eri\u015fim adresi:\u00a0https:\/\/www.mfa.gov.tr\/turkiye-cumhuriyeti-ve-irak-cumhuriyeti-heyetleri-arasinda-yapilan-gorusmeye-iliskin-ortak-sonuc-bildiris.tr.mfa<\/a><\/li>\n
  3. T\u00fcrkiye Cumhuriyeti D\u0131\u015fi\u015fleri Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131. (t.y.). T\u00fcrkiye-Irak siyasi ili\u015fkileri. Eri\u015fim adresi:\u00a0https:\/\/www.mfa.gov.tr\/turkiye-irak-siyasi-iliskileri.tr.mfa<\/a><\/li>\n
  4. Orta Do\u011fu Ara\u015ft\u0131rmalar\u0131 ve Stratejik D\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnce Derne\u011fi (ODAP). (t.y.). T\u00fcrkiye-Irak Kalk\u0131nma Yolu Projesi: Yeni \u0130pek Yolu olur mu? Eri\u015fim adresi:\u00a0https:\/\/www.odap.org\/bolgeler\/orta-dogu\/turkiye-irak-kalkinma-yolu-projesi-yeni-ipek-yolu-olur-mu<\/a><\/li>\n
  5. Y\u00fcksek\u00f6\u011fretim Kurulu (Y\u00d6K). (t.y.). Y\u00fcksek\u00f6\u011fretim Bilim Dergisi. Eri\u015fim adresi:\u00a0https:\/\/acikbilim.yok.gov.tr\/bitstream\/handle\/20.500.12812\/330991\/yokacikbilim_10090614.pdf?sequence=-1&isallowed=y<\/a><\/li>\n
  6. Uluda\u011f \u00dcniversitesi. (t.y.). T\u00fcrkiye-Irak ili\u015fkileri ve b\u00f6lgesel i\u015f birli\u011fi. Eri\u015fim adresi:\u00a0https:\/\/acikerisim.uludag.edu.tr\/server\/api\/core\/bitstreams\/bc594d98-03da-4644-9f0c-7c12d8d4478a\/content<\/a><\/li>\n
  7. T\u00fcrk Diplomasisi ve Uluslararas\u0131 Politika Ara\u015ft\u0131rma Merkezi (TUDPAM). (t.y.). Son d\u00f6nem T\u00fcrkiye-Irak ili\u015fkileri. Eri\u015fim adresi:\u00a0https:\/\/tudpam.org\/son-donem-turkiye-irak-iliskileri<\/a><\/li>\n
  8. Okur, M. A. (t.y.). Cumhuriyetimizin y\u00fcz y\u0131ll\u0131k yolculu\u011fundan \u201cT\u00fcrk Eli\u201dne: T\u00fcrk d\u0131\u015f politikas\u0131n\u0131n ufkunda yeni(den) bir d\u00fcnya m\u00fcmk\u00fcn m\u00fc? T\u00fcrk D\u00fcnyas\u0131.<\/li>\n
  9. Okur, M. A. (t.y.). Cumhuriyetimizin 100. y\u0131l\u0131nda k\u00f6kleri hat\u0131rlamak: D\u00fcnyac\u0131 milliyet\u00e7ilik, tarihli T\u00fcrkl\u00fck ve tarihli M\u00fcsl\u00fcmanl\u0131k \u00fczerine.<\/li>\n
  10. Anadolu Ajans\u0131. (2023, Kas\u0131m 14). T\u00fcrkiye-Iraq Development Road Project: Enhancing regional connectivity and trade. Eri\u015fim adresi:\u00a0https:\/\/www.aa.com.tr\/en\/middle-east\/turkiye-iraq-development-road-project-enhancing-regional-connectivity-trade\/2993555<\/a><\/li>\n
  11. T\u00fcrkiye Cumhuriyeti D\u0131\u015fi\u015fleri Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131. (2023). T\u00fcrkiye-Irak ikili ticaret verileri. Eri\u015fim adresi:\u00a0https:\/\/www.mfa.gov.tr\/turkiye-irak-siyasi-iliskileri.tr.mfa<\/a><\/li>\n
  12. Global Highways. (2023, May\u0131s 18). 17 billion T\u00fcrkiye-Iraq road rail link. Eri\u015fim adresi:\u00a0https:\/\/www.globalhighways.com\/news\/17-billion-turkey-iraq-road-rail-link<\/a><\/li>\n
  13. \u015eahin, M., & Okur, M. A. (2024). ABD d\u0131\u015f politikas\u0131nda jeoekonomik stratejiler: Rusya \u00f6rne\u011fi. Marmara \u00dcniversitesi \u0130ktisadi ve \u0130dari Bilimler Dergisi, 46(2), 429-451.\u00a0https:\/\/doi.org\/10.14780\/muiibd.1482912<\/a><\/li>\n
  14. \u0130leti\u015fim Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131. (2024, Nisan 22). T\u00fcrkiye ile Irak aras\u0131nda 11 anla\u015fma imzaland\u0131. Eri\u015fim adresi:\u00a0https:\/\/www.iletisim.gov.tr\/turkce\/haberler\/detay\/turkiye-ile-irak-arasinda-11-anlasma-imzalandi<\/a><\/li>\n
  15. Cumhurba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u0130leti\u015fim Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131. (2024, 22 Nisan).\u00a0T\u00fcrkiye ile Irak aras\u0131nda 11 anla\u015fma imzaland\u0131. Eri\u015fim adresi:\u00a0https:\/\/www.iletisim.gov.tr\/turkce\/haberler\/detay\/turkiye-ile-irak-arasinda-11-anlasma-imzalandi<\/a>\u00a0(Eri\u015fim tarihi: 16 A\u011fustos 2025).<\/li>\n
  16. C. D\u0131\u015fi\u015fleri Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131. (2024, 22 Nisan).T\u00fcrkiye Cumhuriyeti ile Irak Cumhuriyeti Ortak Bildirisi. Eri\u015fim adresi:\u00a0https:\/\/www.mfa.gov.tr\/turkiye-cumhuriyeti-ile-irak-cumhuriyeti-ortak-bildirisi.tr.mfa\u00a0(Eri\u015fim tarihi: 16 A\u011fustos 2025).<\/li>\n
  17. Anadolu Ajans\u0131. (2024, 22 Nisan).Cumhurba\u015fkan\u0131 Erdo\u011fan\u2019\u0131n Irak ziyareti. Eri\u015fim adresi:\u00a0https:\/\/www.aa.com.tr\/tr\/gundem\/cumhurbaskani-erdoganin-irak-ziyareti\/\u00a0(Eri\u015fim tarihi: 16 A\u011fustos 2025).<\/li>\n
  18. Anadolu Ajans\u0131. (2025, 8 Temmuz).T\u00fcrkiye ve Irak, Kalk\u0131nma Yolu Projesi kapsam\u0131nda i\u015f birli\u011fini s\u00fcrd\u00fcr\u00fcyor. Eri\u015fim adresi:\u00a0https:\/\/www.aa.com.tr\/tr\/ekonomi\/turkiye-ve-irak-kalkinma-yolu-projesi-kapsaminda-is-birligini-surduruyor\/(Eri\u015fim tarihi: 16 A\u011fustos 2025).<\/li>\n
  19. TRT Haber. (2025, 25 Nisan).T\u00fcrkiye-Irak G\u00fcvenlik Diyalo\u011fu: PKK\u2019ya kar\u015f\u0131 ortak operasyon sinyali. Eri\u015fim adresi:\u00a0https:\/\/www.trthaber.com\/haber\/gundem\/turkiye-irak-guvenlik-diyalogu-pkkya-karsi-ortak-operasyon-sinyali-876543.html\u00a0(Eri\u015fim tarihi: 16 A\u011fustos 2025).<\/li>\n
  20. Al Monitor. (2025, 30 Temmuz).Iraq, T\u00fcrkiye still struggle to move forward on Development Road project. Eri\u015fim adresi:\u00a0https:\/\/www.al-monitor.com\/originals\/2025\/07\/iraq-turkey-still-struggle-move-forward-development-road-project(Eri\u015fim tarihi: 16 A\u011fustos 2025).<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    Geoeconomics is a strategic concept in the international relations literature that refers to the pursuit of geopolitical objectives through economic instruments.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":29,"featured_media":1607,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[26],"tags":[375,270,372,373,377,371,374,376,7],"ppma_author":[316],"class_list":["post-1606","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-foreign-policy","tag-cold-war","tag-foreign-policy","tag-geoeconomics","tag-geopolitical-objectives","tag-international-system","tag-iraq","tag-joint-economic-and-trade-committee-jetco","tag-strategic-concept","tag-turkiye"],"acf":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"authors":[{"term_id":316,"user_id":29,"is_guest":0,"slug":"nazlican-koroglu","display_name":"Nazl\u0131can K\u00f6ro\u011flu","avatar_url":{"url":"https:\/\/www.toplum.org.tr\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Nazlican-Koroglu.jpg","url2x":"https:\/\/www.toplum.org.tr\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Nazlican-Koroglu.jpg"},"0":null,"1":"","2":"","3":"","4":"","5":"","6":"","7":"","8":""}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.toplum.org.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1606","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.toplum.org.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.toplum.org.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.toplum.org.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/29"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.toplum.org.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1606"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.toplum.org.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1606\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1608,"href":"https:\/\/www.toplum.org.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1606\/revisions\/1608"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.toplum.org.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1607"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.toplum.org.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1606"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.toplum.org.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1606"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.toplum.org.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1606"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.toplum.org.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/ppma_author?post=1606"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}